Current:Home > MarketsBarbora Krejcikova beat Jasmine Paolini in thrilling women's Wimbledon final for second Grand Slam trophy -Trailblazer Wealth Guides
Barbora Krejcikova beat Jasmine Paolini in thrilling women's Wimbledon final for second Grand Slam trophy
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:13:02
Barbora Krejcikova won Wimbledon for her second Grand Slam title with a 6-2, 2-6, 6-4 victory over Jasmine Paolini in the final on Saturday.
Krejcikova is a 28-year-old from the Czech Republic who adds this trophy to her championship at the French Open in 2021.
She was unseeded in Paris back then and was only the 31st of 32 seeds at the All England Club after illness and a back injury this season limited her to a 7-9 record entering this tournament.
Krejcikova is the eighth woman to leave Wimbledon as the champion in the past eight editions of the event. Last year's champion also is from the Czech Republic: unseeded Marketa Vondrousova, who lost in the first round last week.
The seventh-seeded Paolini was the runner-up at the French Open last month and is the first woman since Serena Williams in 2016 to get to the finals at Roland Garros and Wimbledon in the same season.
Both finalists Saturday took turns being charge of the run of play.
Playing coolly and efficiently — seemingly effortlessly — Krejcikova claimed 10 of the first 11 points and quickly owned a double-break lead at 5-1.
As much as the crowd, likely because of a desire to see a more competitive contest, pulled loudly for Paolini, yelling "Forza!" ("Let's go!") the way she often does or "Calma!" ("Be calm!"), Krejcikova never wavered.
She has net skills, to be sure — that's part of why she has won seven Grand Slam women's doubles titles, including two at Wimbledon — but Krejcikova mainly was content to stay back at the baseline, simply delivering one smooth groundstroke after another to its appointed spot and getting the better of the lengthiest exchanges.
There really was no need for anything other than Plan A in the early going in front of a Centre Court crowd that included actors Tom Cruise, Kate Beckinsale and Hugh Jackman.
Paolini did try to shake things up a bit, with the occasional serve-and-volley rush forward or drop shot, but she couldn't solve Krejcikova. Not yet, anyway.
After the lopsided first set, Paolini went to the locker room. She emerged a different player, one who no longer looked like someone burdened by residual fatigue from the longest women's semifinal in Wimbledon history, her 2-hour, 51-minute win over Donna Vekic on Thursday.
Paolini had come back from dropping the first set in that one, so she knew she had it in her. And she began the second set against Krejcikova in style, delivering deep groundstrokes and grabbing a 3-0 advantage.
Once the match was tied at a set apiece, it was Krejcikova who left the court to try to recalibrate.
Her shots that suddenly went so awry in the match's middle — after four unforced errors in the first set, she made 14 in the second — were back to being crisp and clean.
At 3-all in the deciding set, it was Paolini who faltered, double-faulting for the only time all afternoon to get broken.
Krejcikova then held at love for 5-3, but when she served for the championship, things got a little tougher.
She needed to save a pair of break points and required three match points to get across the finish line, winning when Paolini missed a backhand.
- In:
- Wimbledon
- Tennis
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- With 10 Appointees on the Ninth Circuit, Trump Seeks to Tame His Nemesis
- What will AI mean for the popular app Be My Eyes?
- 1 dead, at least 22 wounded in mass shooting at Juneteenth celebration in Illinois
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Shark Week 2023 is here! Shop nautical merch from these brands to celebrate the occasion
- Joy-Anna Duggar Gives Birth, Welcomes New Baby With Austin Forsyth
- Greenland’s Melting: Heat Waves Are Changing the Landscape Before Their Eyes
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Allergic to cats? There may be hope!
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Big Pokey, pioneering Houston rapper, dies at 48
- Global Warming Is Pushing Pacific Salmon to the Brink, Federal Scientists Warn
- For the first time in 15 years, liberals win control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- 'Oppenheimer' sex scene with Cillian Murphy sparks backlash in India: 'Attack on Hinduism'
- ‘A Death Spiral for Research’: Arctic Scientists Worried as Alaska Universities Face 40% Funding Cut
- Ireland is paying up to $92,000 to people who buy homes on remote islands. Here's how it works.
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Medicare tests a solution to soaring hospice costs: Let private insurers run it
In Montana, Children File Suit to Protect ‘the Last Best Place’
Why do some people get UTIs over and over? A new report holds clues
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Tiffany Haddish opens up about 2021 breakup with Common: It 'wasn't mutual'
Don’t Miss This $65 Deal on $142 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Anti-Aging Skincare Products
Trump Weakens Endangered Species Protections, Making It Harder to Consider Effects of Climate Change